Author: Lawrence Rhodes

  • Div.3 – 4th team lose at Brighton

    Brighton & Hove 4 —3-1—Bexhill 4

    Division 3 Mon 2nd Mar 2026 00:00 Winner: Home   

    Result from Sussex League LMS

    BoardRatingBrighton & Hove 4VBexhill 4Rating
    1 1793Pellatt, ZoeG1 – 0G Swain, Philip1690
    2 1747St Louis, LaurenceG0 – 1G Kuzmanoski, Oliver1661
    3 1908Westhead, BillyB1 – 0G O’Neill, Tom C1424
    4 1637Keiller, MathiasG1 – 0G James, Jonathan1329
    Average17723 – 11526

    Our team faced the current Division 3 leaders and was clearly outrated most significantly on Boards 3 and 4.

    Well done Oliver for a result above par!

    The team is still in with a chance to avoid relegation, positioned currently 8th/11, 2 points clear of the bottom. ( Go to our ‘Sussex League’ Page for the LMS page and navigate to League Tables)

  • Friday’s Home Contests

    Bexhill 3 —4-0—Eastbourne 3

    Division 3 Fri 27th Feb 2026 00:00 Winner: Home   

    Result from Sussex League LMS

    A strong performance by all, leaving the team well placed in the Division 3 league table.

    BoardRatingBexhill 3VEastbourne 3Rating
    1 1858Petersons, JanisG1 – 0B Pannett, Matthew1735
    2 1781Blewitt, Stephen DG1 – 0G Gowers, Mark1617
    3 1735Kimber, John DN1 – 0G Dineen, Thomas1616
    4 1685Swain, PhilipG1 – 0G Clark, Colin D1546
    Average17654 – 01629
    TeamPlayWonDrawLostForAgainstPointsSPMPIM
    Hastings & St Leonards 4842218½13½10000
    Bexhill 3741216½11½9000
    Brighton & Hove 464111599000
    Brighton & Hove 3740316128000
    Eastbourne 3840415½16½8000

    WATSON TROPHY – THE LINE HOLDS

    Bexhill 2 —2-2—Hastings & St Leonards

    Paul Watson Trophy Fri 27th Feb 2026 19:30 Winner: Draw   

    Results from Sussex County Chess Association

    BoardRatingBexhill 2VHastings & St LeonardsRating
    1 1763 (1986)Chapman, LukeG½ – ½G Sugden, John N2046 (2011)
    2 0000 (1909)Hubbard, MichaelG½ – ½G Cove, Henry1908 (1907)
    3 1726 (1670)Luxton, William HG0 – 1G Cobb, William1739 (1882)
    4 1646 (1593)Hayward, MichaelG1 – 0G Cload, Adrian1615 (1563)
    Total51352 – 27308

    Another tough ask against a very strong side, which the side rose to meet. Special congratulations to Michael Hayward for taking the score to level.

  • Good Performances

    Worthing 1 —2.5 -1.5— Bexhill 2

    Division 1 Mon 23rd Feb 2026 00:00 Winner: Home   

    Result from Sussex League LMS

    BoardRatingWorthing 1VBexhill 2Rating
    1 2155Payne, Matthew JG1 – 0G Hubbard, Michael1913
    2 2159Jones, ChrisB½ – ½G Lumsden, James1915
    3 2094Pai, SidhanthG½ – ½G Fleming, Andrew SJ1882
    4 1857Skinner, Nicholas HG½ – ½G Hayward, Michael1576
    Average20672½ – 1½1822

    Without an on-the-spot match report, it’s clear that there were individual results which achieved beyond expectations against one of the traditionally strongest clubs in the League.

    Well done, 2nd team!

  • Narrow margin

    Bexhill 1 —-1.5-2.5— Lewes 1

    Division 1 Fri 20th Feb 2026 00:00 Winner: Away   

    Result from Sussex League LMS

    BoardRatingBexhill 1VLewes 1Rating
    1 2023Nguyen, AnhG½ – ½G Buckland, Louis2073
    2 2068Tebbs, Howard LB0 – 1G Adams, George2076
    3 1832Petersons, JanisG1 – 0G Masani, Matthew M1968
    4 1584Hayward, MichaelG0 – 1G Farr, Peter G2003
    Average18771½ – 2½2030

    A defeat at home on Friday evening, but by the narrowest of margins and where we were out-rated on all boards.

    Well done Janis on an important full point!

    Our 1st team is still in the top half of the league table :

    League table for Division 1

    TeamPlayWonDrawLostForAgainstPointsSPMPIM
    Brighton & Hove 1742119910000
    Lewes 1842217½14½10000
    Hastings & St Leonards 1633013½10½9000
    Horsham 1732215½12½8000
    Bexhill 1732214½13½8000
    East Grinstead 1540113½6½8000
    Haywards Heath 1731313½14½7000
    Worthing 1721412165000
    East Grinstead 2711511½16½3000
    Bexhill 2711510183000
    Crowborough61147½16½3000
  • 5th Teams’ progress

    Hastings & St.L. 5 —1-3—Bexhill 5

    Division 4 Thu 19th Feb 2026 00:00 Winner: Away   

    Result from Sussex League LMS

    BoardRatingHastings & St Leonards 5VBexhill 5Rating
    1 1533Cosens, DerekG0 – 1B Carthew, Jo1662
    2 1528Hosannah, AaronG0 – 1G Luxton, William H1669
    3 1419Fletcher, Martin GG0 – 1G Rhodes, Lawrence1632
    4 1374Hosannah, AmirG1 – 0N O Niell, Thomas0000
    Average14641 – 31241

    A good result at Hastings. Tom, playing one of his first games as a new member with the Black pieces battled hard against a rising junior but came off worst in the R + P ending.

    Bill, also with Black soon levelled the team score, gaining multiple pawns in a double rooks and pawns ending.

    I didn’t get to see Jo’s game but a glimpse or two showed solid control.

    I had an interesting, if hair-raising, game. on board 3. Having pushed pawns to squeeze the opponent on both wings, I pressed with a K-side attack, while I left the Q-side hanging.. The game was flawed, we both missed opportunities. We reached this position ( which had morphed from an English opening to a Saemisch formation against an Old Indian structure) after 25…Bd7

    The Rc3 both cut off the entry points for the Black Q and protected a3. This would mean several moves to break open the Q-side and while the Black Q is off-side, the Black’s K-side is vulnerable. I was down to 5 mins or less on the clock and there were some interesting tactics which swung back and forth but eventually in my favour.

    Th game concluded ( analysis by Fritz 19 ) :

    26. Rg1 (26. Bxh6! gxh6 27. Nf5+ Kf8 28. Nxh6 Rg7 29. Qf2 Nxc4 !) 26… Nxc4 Now Black is better 27. Bxh6 (27. Rxc4 Bb5 28. Ke1! Bxc4 29. Nf5 Qxa3 30. Qg6 Qc3+ 31. Kf2 Qc2+ 32. Kg3 Rxf5 33. Qxf5 Rf8 34. Qe6+ Rf7 35. Bxh6 Qe2 36. Qe8+ Rf8 37. Qe6+ Rf7 =) 27… Bb5 (27… Nxa3 28. Ra1 Qb5+ 29. Kf2 Nc4 30. Bg5 Qxb4 31. Rac1 Na5 32. Kg1) 28. Kf2 +- Nd2 29. Nf5 Nxf3 30. Qxf3 Bd7 31. Bxg7 (31. Rxg7+ Rxg7 32. Bxg7) 31… Bxf5 32. exf5 (32. Bf6+ Kf8 33. Qxf5 Qd7 34. Qg6 Rxf6+ 35. Qxf6+ Qf7 36. Qxf7+ Kxf7 37. Rxc7+) 32… Rxg7 (32… Qd7 33. f6 e4 34. Qxe4 Qe8 35. Qg6) 33. Rxg7+ Kxg7 34. f6+ Kf8 35. Qg4 Qe8 36. Qg7# 1-0

    The result leaves us well placed and undefeated near the top of Div.4 :

    League table for Division 4 (top section)

    TeamPlayWonDrawLostForAgainstPointsSPMPIM
    Worthing 3842220½11½10000
    Bexhill 5642016810000
    Lewes 2641116½7½9000
    Uckfield 2632113118000

    The final match against Lewes 2 on 16 March looks as if will be the key one.

  • Div.3 Draw

    Uckfield 1 —2-2— Bexhill 3

    Division 3 Wed 18th Feb 2026 00:00 Winner: Draw   

    Result from Sussex League LMS

    BoardRatingUckfield 1VBexhill 3Rating
    1 1933Airlie, ArranB0 – 1G Petersons, Janis1832
    2 1721Stockham, MichaelB1 – 0G Hayward, Michael1584
    3 1557Archbold, BeaudenG0 – 1G Tracey, William F1616
    4 1593Hill, JaydenB1 – 0N O Niell, Thomas0000
    Average17012 – 21258

    The result leaves our 3rd team in a solid position :

    League table for Division 3

    TeamPlayWonDrawLostForAgainstPointsSPMPIM
    Hastings & St Leonards 4741216½11½9000
    Brighton & Hove 464111599000
    Eastbourne 3740315½12½8000
    Uckfield 1731315½12½7000
    Bexhill 3631212½11½7000
    Brighton & Hove 3630313116000
    Bexhill 4622211136000
    East Grinstead 352121195000
    Horsham 5812510½21½4000
    Eastbourne 452037½12½4000
    Haywards Heath 251138123000

    SP = Season Penalties, MP = Match Penalties, IM = Incomplete Matches,

  • League contests : Bexhill Teams Achieve well

    Bexhill 2 —1.5-2.5 — Crowborough

    Division 1 Fri 13th Feb 2026 00:00 Winner: Away   

    Results from Sussex League LMs.

    BoardRatingBexhill 2VCrowboroughRating
    1 1911Lumsden, JamesG½ – ½G Freeman, Luke2042
    2 1877Fleming, Andrew SJG½ – ½G Lawrance, Jon AN1928
    3 1831Petersons, JanisG½ – ½B Michaud, Gerald1879
    4 1747Kimber, John DN0 – 1G Blythe, Douglas1645
    Average18421½ – 2½1874

    Bexhill 4 —2.5-1.5 —- East Grinstead 3

    Division 3 Fri 13th Feb 2026 00:00 Winner: Home   

    Results from Sussex League LMS

    BoardRatingBexhill 4VEast Grinstead 3Rating
    1 1693Swain, PhilipG0 – 1G Wall, Robert1756
    2 1648Kuzmanoski, OliverG1 – 0B Amarasinghe, Asanka1747
    3 1582Hayward, MichaelG½ – ½G Waldock, Adrian DP1661
    4 1610Tracey, William FG1 – 0G Holmes, Thomas1454
    Average16342½ – 1½1655

    Match reports may follow. This is bare news.

    Div.3 result is encouraging.

    Div.1 result looks as though the line held in the pairings where our team was out-rated.

  • Div.3 losses analysed

    Bexhill 3 —-0-4 —Hastings & St.L. 4

    Division 3 Fri 6th Feb 2026 00:00 Winner: Away   

    Result from Sussex League LMS

    BoardRatingBexhill 3VHastings & St Leonards 4Rating
    1 1791Blewitt, Stephen DG0 – 1G Orsborne, Sarah1722
    2 1760Kimber, John DN0 – 1G Rooney, Caelan1664
    3 1707Swain, PhilipG0 – 1G Bryant, Marc A1565
    4 1557Balp, OliverG0 – 1G Woodhams, Mason1567
    Average17040 – 41630

    The result was a more complex story than the results would suggest. Steve had a great battle from his Czech Pirc Defence ( c6, d6, e5 ) against an Austrian attack formation ( pawns d4, e4, f4). White allowed Steve’s Q x b2 so that White’s centre was hanging, though Steve’s King ( having castled Q-side ) was somewhat exposed to White’s strong bishops. Steve went into complications on the K-side, attempting a mating combination which involved a Q sacrifice ..Q x Bg4. He missed White’s counter Q sacrifice when it interposed between the Black Rook’s check on the h-file. After Rx Qh3+ the recapture on h3 meant Steve was battling the exchange down. White’s material advantage in the endgame paid off despite Steve’s prolonged resistance.

    John made a bold pawn sacrifice for activity early in his game as follows :

    1. d4 d5 2. Nc3 Nf6 3. e4 dxe4 4. Bg5 Bf5 5. f3 exf3 6. Qxf3 Bc8

    After the continuation, John’s active play ( though with the questionable early handing of 2 bishops to Black) left John with only a -0.77 evaluation . The game continued.7. Bxf6 exf6 8. O-O-O Be7 9. Bd3 Nc6 10. Bb5 Bd7 11. Bxc6 bxc6 12. d5 cxd5 13. Nxd5 O-O 14. Nh3 Re8 15. Rhe1 Rb8 The computer did not like John’s next move in this position, preferring exchanges on e7

    16. Qg3 The continuation showed the power of the bishops on this open board .. Bd6 17. Rxe8+ Bxe8 18. Qf2 Be5 19. Nc3 Qe7 20. Qxa7 Qb4 21. Rd3 Qxb2+ 22. Kd2 Qb4 23. Ke2 Bxc3 24. Rxc3 Qe4+ 25. Qe3 Qxg2+ 26. Nf2 Bb5+ 27. Kd2 Rd8+ 28. Kc1 Qd5 29. Ra3 Qc4 30. Rd3 Rxd3 31. Nxd3 Qxa2 32. Qe7 Qa1+ 33. Kd2 Qa5+ 34. Kc1. The final stage of the endgame involved the advance of the Black phalanx of K-side pawns. John’s ambitious play may have stretched into overreach, but it was one of those marginal decisions which made the difference, but which also made for good chess.

    In Phil’s game, the rarely played Grob Attack!

    1. g4 d5 2. Bg2 Bxg4. This is playable, with the complications following , but the majority of games continue more safely with 2..c6, to avoid the pressure on d5 and the weakness left on b7.
    2. g4 d5 2. Bg2 Bxg4 3. c4 Nf6 4. Nc3

    Here the computer favours .4…d4 or ..c6.

    4… e6 5. Qb3 Qc8 – returning the pawn. 6. cxd5 c6 7. f3 The computer likes this last move, strange as it looks, blocking the long diagonal

    7… Bh5 8. dxe6 Na6 9. Bh3 Qc7 10. exf7+ Bxf7 The computer now favours Black.

    11. Qc2 Bd6 12. Ne4 Nxe4 13. Qxe4+ Kf8 14. b3 Re8 15. Qc2

    In this position, Black could gain the upper hand with ..Nb4

    Instead Black continued ..Bxh2 16. Ba3+ Kg8 17. O-O-O Bd6 18. Bb2 Nb4 $17 19. Qb1 Qa5 (19… c5 is preferred by the computer ) 20. a3 Qc5+ 21. Bc3 Nd5 22. b4 Qc4 23. Qc2 Bg6 2 (23… Nxc3 maintains the pressure) 24. e4 Rxe4?? (24… Nxc3=) 25. fxe4 Bxe4 26. Be6+( The resource Phil must have overlooked … Kf8 27. Bxg7+ Kxg7 28. Qxc4 and Phil resigned. In such a tactical swamp it is easy to go wrong and Phil had good chances in this game and full credit to his opponent. It was engaging chess by both!

      Oli played a sound formation in a Classical King’s Indian

      1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. Nf3 O-O 6. Bd3 Bg4 7. h3 Bxf3 8. Qxf3 Nc6 9. Be3 e5 10. d5 Nd4=11 11. Qd1 after which he could have left the N on d4 and pushed his Q-side pawns. Instead , choosing to exchange on d4 Oli was left with a thorny pawn in his centre which became inflamed.

      11… h6 12. Bxd4 exd4 13. Ne2 Nd7 14. O-O Qe7 15. Re1 Rae8 16. b4 b6 = (16… a5 17. bxa5 Nc5) 17. Qd2 (17. a3 =) 17… Qh4 18. Rad1 Kh8 19. Bc2 Ne5 I’m not sure why Oli chose not to eliminate the pawn while he had the chance in this position . Maybe he thought the loss of the c4 pawn in exchange was a worse prospect.

      20. Bd3 ? (20. Nxd4 Nxc4 21. Qe2 Bxd4 22. Rxd4 Ne5 23. Qd2 g5 24. Bd1 is evaluated at +0.75 for White ) 20… Nxd3 21. Qxd3 Rxe4 22. Ng3 Re5 23. Rxe5 (23. Re4) is better 23… dxe5 24. a4 Re8 25. Re1 f5 26. Ne2 e4 27. Qd2 e3 28. fxe3 dxe3 29. Qd1 Qxc4 30. b5 At this point I wasn’t able to follow Oli’s game much further but it was clear that the mass of Black pawns would prevail. However, the crucial decision was in essence just a marginal one in the moment at the board.

      In conclusion, while overall disappointment is natural at such a match score, each game was not a case of being outclassed. There was some very good chess throughout the evening and our thanks and congratulations are due to the Hastings team.

    1. Div.1 Draw at Crowborough

      Crowborough —2-2— Bexhill 1

      Division 1 Fri 6th Feb 2026 00:00 Winner: Draw   

      Result from Sussex League LMS

      BoardRatingCrowboroughVBexhill 1Rating
      1 2038Freeman, LukeG½ – ½B Tebbs, Howard L2069
      2 1928Lawrance, Jon ANG½ – ½G Lumsden, James1914
      3 1866Michaud, GeraldB1 – 0G Chapman, Luke1990
      4 1655Blythe, DouglasG0 – 1G Kuzmanoski, Oliver1638
      Average18722 – 21903

      Without a full match report, this looks a sound result and good to see Oliver taking the full point.

      The updated league table shows our 1st team in contention at the top end

      Brighton & Hove 164111779000
      East Grinstead 1540113½6½8000
      Bexhill 1632113118000
      Hastings & St Leonards 1532011½8½8000
    2. Division 1 defeat at Brighton

      Brighton & Hove 1 — 3.5 -0.5 —Bexhill 2

      Division 1 Mon 2nd Feb 2026 00:00 Winner: Home   

      Result from Sussex League LMS

      BoardRatingBrighton & Hove 1VBexhill 2Rating
      1 2236Rutherford, Luke EN1 – 0G Hubbard, Michael1916
      2 2191Brewer, Callum DG1 – 0G Lumsden, James1914
      3 2127Rogacewicz, MikolajB½ – ½G Fleming, Andrew SJ1871
      4 1931Batchelor, Paul AG1 – 0G Hayward, Michael1584
      Average21223½ – ½1822

      With a major disparity in ratings, the result – for our 2nd team’s first season in the top division – is foreseeable against the strongest teams such as Brighton. On the face of it, without a match report from team members, Andrew looks to have done very well to achieve a draw. Our thanks to Brighton for hosting.

      With 4 matches outstanding, the team still has chances of staying up, being placed 3rd from the bottom of the table, just above East Grinstead followed by Crowborough.